Archive for June, 2009

When Rhetoric Inspires


** Note: The following post is written by guest blogger Brandon Wojcik

Not surprisingly, as soon as news emerged of the killing of Dr. George Tiller, a Wichita, Kansas-based doctor who was one of the few nationwide who provided late-term abortions, statements of regret began pouring in from various anti-abortion groups.  International Right to Life, the Family Research Council, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and many others offered compassionate words of sympathy for Dr. Tiller’s wife, four children, and ten grandchildren who are now without a husband, father, and grandfather.

That is, except Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue, the particularly vitriolic anti-abortion group that led the “Summer of Mercy” protests against Tiller’s clinic in 1991. He callously said of Dr. Tiller’s death:

    “George Tiller was a mass-murderer. We grieve for him that he did not have time to properly prepare his soul to face God. I am more concerned that the Obama Administration will use Tiller’s killing to intimidate pro-lifers into surrendering our most effective rhetoric and actions. Abortion is still murder. And we still must call abortion by its proper name; murder.

    Those men and women who slaughter the unborn are murderers according to the Law of God. We must continue to expose them in our communities and peacefully protest them at their offices and homes, and yes, even their churches.”

While I’m not a Christian, the position espoused by Mr. Terry (and demonstrated by sign-waving protesters here) strikes me as decidedly un-Christian. But perhaps not. Such acts of violence (and there have been many) are almost always condemned by religious groups, but in words only. An organization truly committed to peacefully promoting their ‘pro-life’ cause would recognize that such hate-filled rhetoric–whether intentional or not–inspires deranged individuals to commit acts of violence in the name of their cause. They would recognize that this can’t possibly be a good step towards reconciliation or cooperation with the groups and people with whom they disagree. Then again, what statements like this lead me to believe is that groups like Operation Rescue aren’t interested in reconciliation and cooperation. They are interested in a single-minded religious agenda, and have no intention of ceding ground to anyone.

While to me this is another reminder of the dangerous and destructive influence of conservative religious belief, and the violence that results when infused with politics, I’m not without a sense of realism regarding this issue; clearly these are deeply held convictions, on both sides, and a solution to the question of abortion will not be a “winner take all” victory for one side or the other. I am, and always will be, strongly in favor of abortion rights, and strongly opposed to efforts of the religious right and the Randall Terry’s of the world, but recognize that this can’t be an “us vs. them” fight. Where that leads is more hate, more violence, and more tragedy.

A good list of things you can do in response to Dr. Tiller’s murder, including local vigil events going on today, has been posted here.

A nation without legalized abortion


In the aftermath of the tragic assassination of Dr. George Tiller, we need to remember what is at stake in the debate over abortion. Indeed, we don’t need to use our imaginations to envision what our nation would be like without legalized abortion; we only need to look at countries like Tanzania, where women suffer and die from policies that religious fanatics are trying to impose in our own country right now. The New York Times reports (h/t to Hullabaloo):

Abortion is illegal in Tanzania (except to save the mother’s life or health), so women and girls turn to amateurs, who may dose them with herbs or other concoctions, pummel their bellies or insert objects vaginally. Infections, bleeding and punctures of the uterus or bowel can result, and can be fatal. Doctors treating women after these bungled attempts sometimes have no choice but to remove the uterus.

Pregnancy and childbirth are among the greatest dangers that women face in Africa, which has the world’s highest rates of maternal mortality — at least 100 times those in developed countries. Abortion accounts for a significant part of the death toll.

Maternal mortality is high in Tanzania: for every 100,000 births, 950 women die. In the United States, the figure is 11, and it is even lower in other developed countries. But Tanzania’s record is neither the best nor the worst in Africa. Many other countries have similar statistics; quite a few do better and a handful do markedly worse.

Even more stunning is the effect that backroom abortions have on maternal mortality around the world:

Worldwide, there are 19 million unsafe abortions a year, and they kill 70,000 women (accounting for 13 percent of maternal deaths), mostly in poor countries like Tanzania where abortion is illegal, according to the World Health Organization. More than two million women a year suffer serious complications. According to Unicef, unsafe abortions cause 4 percent of deaths among pregnant women in Africa, 6 percent in Asia and 12 percent in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Is it clear now what we’re talking about when we talk about choice? Is it clear now that when we talk about access to safe and legal abortion, we’re talking about saving tens of thousands of lives and preventing millions of hospitalizations and crippling aftereffects every year?

Keeping abortion outlawed does not actually reduce the number of abortions; rather, it reduces the safety of those performed. The Guttmacher Institute reports:

Legal restrictions on abortion do not affect its incidence. For example, the abortion rate is 29 [per 1,000 women aged 15–44] in Africa, where abortion is illegal in many circumstances in most countries, and it is 28 [per 1,000 women aged 15–44] in Europe, where abortion is generally permitted on broad grounds. The lowest rates in the world are in Western and Northern Europe, where abortion is accessible with few restrictions.

Where abortion is legal and permitted on broad grounds, it is generally safe, and where it is illegal in many circumstances, it is often unsafe. For example, in South Africa, the incidence of infection resulting from abortion decreased by 52% after the abortion law was liberalized in 1996.

The anti-choice movement won’t paint this picture for you, but this is what they’re advocating: a world where women do not have legal rights over their own bodies and are injured or die due to lack of access to safe and legal abortion. It is a horrifying vision, but it’s one that some anti-choice people are willing to kill for. The best response to the terror waged by Dr. Tiller’s murderer and the hatred of the anti-choice movement is to rededicate ourselves to expanding access to safe and legal reproductive health services and ensure that clinics receive the support and security that they need to operate safely. And we need to ensure that freedom of choice in the United States rests on more than Supreme Court rulings by codifying a right to reproductive choice into law.