Election Lessons

Ahhh. What a relief. After eight years of an administration that ruled by its version of “God’s law,” I knew that whatever the results of Tuesday’s election, many things would change for the better. For example, regardless of the outcome, the National Institutes of Health would again be permitted to use the most promising materials in its research – new lines of embryonic stem cells.

The specific results: the election of President-elect Barack Obama, Elizabeth Dole’s loss of her Senate seat, Rep. Pete Stark’s reelection win by an even larger margin (76 percent) than his last election – lead me to the following conclusions regarding the future of nontheists’ rights and separation of church and state in the United States.

Following the rhetoric during the presidential campaign, we now know that even those who support our Constitutional secular government, are willing to parade Christianity as a prerequisite for earning votes. Both Obama and Senator-elect Hagan (Dole’s opponent) felt obliged to prove that they are Christians. Both neglected to add Colin Powell’s commentary: so what if candidate isn’t Christian (though his comment had to do with “allegations” that Obama is Muslim, the same could be said of “allegations” that Hagan doesn’t believe in a god.)

Such rhetoric pushes back many advances that nontheists (and non-Christians in general) have made in terms of visibility, respectability, and acceptance in our society. The invocation offered at the huge public party in Grant Park in Chicago prior to Obama’s acceptance speech was offered in Jesus’s name, and I wondered if Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Wiccans, and other non-Christians in the audience felt as excluded by that as the nontheists in attendance. Those non-theists have told me that their excitement at being there was dampened by the fact that our President-elect would invite a minister who wasn’t even interested in including all the theists with a more inclusive prayer to God (the kind of prayers nontheists usually endure.)

President-elect Obama has promised to expand faith-based initiatives and even indicated that some of the government grants may continue to flow directly into church coffers. The Secular Coalition for America is working with over 40 other organizations to convince the new president to eliminate the privileging of religion over effective secular social service grantees, and to deal with the other abuses seen in the current faith-based scheme. On the plus side, Obama has stated that he will require that grantees stop discriminating in hiring based on religion when using such funds.

I do expect to see a renewed respect for science. Thus in addition to stem cell research, sex education funds and international family planning aid might again flow without limitations regarding theologically-based abstinence-only requirements. Creationism may now be placed where it belongs in public schools – comparative religion and world literature curriculum; it is definitely NOT a scientific theory. And when a creation story is taught in religion or literature curriculum in public schools, those curriculum must place it beside the many other creation stories of the world, and must not present one story as the truth over any others.

There will be many more changes to come. As we wish good-riddance to eight years of faith-based rule, I end on the most positive note. When Representative Pete Stark allowed the Secular Coalition for America to announce his nontheism, many individuals told me that they assumed he did so because he planned to retire. I assured them he planned to run for reelection, and having interacted with Rep. Stark, I can assure everyone that he is more vibrant and “young” than his chronological years should allow. His formidable reelection win should embolden other nontheistic members of Congress (at least those from parts of the country considered “safe” to do so) to refrain from hiding their lifestance. Perhaps before the next election cycle there will be more than one out non-theist in Congress. Until then the caucus of nontheists in Congress will consist of – in Stephen Colbert’s words, “Stark, his self and him.”

  • BFBF

    “Both Obama and Senator-elect Hagan (Dole

  • William Bogie

    While I share some of Brotha’s views on Israel I think he overstates the importance of Israel and the Jewish vote on the percieved “Christianess” of Obama and Hagel. To be blunt I think it had far more to do with the christian vote than the Jewish vote, especially in North Carolina where the total Jewish population equals 0.03% of the population. According to the Jewish Virtual Library there are 26,345 Jews out of a total population of 8,683,242 in North Carolina.

    Since Hagan beat Dole, The incumbent by 357,360 votes it is fair to say that the Jewsih vote had very little significance in the election.

    North Carolina is however an overwhelmingly christian state. Dole’s attacks on Hagan about her “godlessness” were aimed at alarming the christians in her state not the Jews.

  • BFBF

    Will,

    If you’re Christian then it’s an automatic support for Israel, voters assume. If you’re an Aethiest or a Muslim, you aint going to get that vote because there is no connection religously.

    BFBF

  • William Bogie

    I doubt the connection is that simple or absolute. For example,you are a christian and you do not support Israel and I am sure there are more like you. Furthermore, even if the premise were true it would not have had much effect in North Carolina since Jews make up such a small part of the population.

    I do believe though that many christians would refuse to vote for an atheist or muslim because of prejudice against those groups. See my post about Star Jones. Since Christians make up such a large portion of North Carolina’s electorate that would be the overriding impetus for Dole’s “godlessness” ad.

  • BFBF
  • William Bogie

    “There will be no secular President without bending over and taken one for the ZIONIST Christian and Jew!”

    Your correct that there will not be a secular president, at leats not anytime soon. But I’ll tell you this, should a secular man or woman with agnostic or atheist beliefs who was pro-Isreal would not win the election. this would be because of the predjudice of the Christian, Jewish and Muslim adherents who believe one must believe in god to be a good person.

    My comments were directed at your assesment of the senatorial election in North Carolina. In that case the Jewish vote is so small that it wouldn’t be a factor in any election save an extremely close one.

    Now to suggest that jews are only insterested in Isreal isn’t true. They have the same concerns as everybody else (the economy, national defense, civil rights, etc). I live near some very Jewish parts of Chicago, in cluding the northern suburb of Skokie. Support of Isreal is very strong in these neighborhoods and I would say it is a make or break issue for them but it is not only issue they are concerned about.

    Your quotes by Jefferson and Washington are only relevant if you suggest that the US engage in a “hands off” foreign policy. A foreign policy in which the US refuses to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries whether it is Isreal, South Africa, Rwanda, Serbia, Somalia or anywhere else. Should you argue that the US should be involved in the internal affairs of any country then you would be a hypocrit in using those quotes.

  • BFBF

    “Should you argue that the US should be involved in the internal affairs of any country then you would be a hypocrit in using those quotes.”

    The point was that the US should be on the side of Justice if they are dealing with foriegn conflict. They should not take sides based on interest, especially an unjust one.

    BFBF

  • William Bogie

    “The point was that the US should be on the side of Justice if they are dealing with foriegn conflict. They should not take sides based on interest, especially an unjust one.”

    That is not what Jefferson and Washington were saying in the quotes you provided. They were saying “stay out entirely” and they were correct.

    Often, deciding which is the “just” cause depends on one’s point of view. Jews genuinely belive Isreal to be the “just” cause and they can point to the bible to justify it.

    Both sides use violence to further their cause. I say let them beat the crap out of each other until they decide to stop. Only then will it stop for good.